Blog

On a Thursday morning last month, a primary school teacher climbed off a boat onto a concrete landing on the western side of Stromboli, walked up a path that no vehicle has ever used, and let herself into a room belonging to the village church. She had arrived the day before, because there is no way to arrive on the morning you are needed. By the time she opened the door, a bell was ringing in a hamlet of roughly thirty people for the first time in more than twenty years, and the register she was about to open had exactly one name on it.

The name belongs to a six year old girl, and we are not going to print it. In a place where everybody knows everybody and the entire school roll is one child, naming her would identify her to every person who will ever read about her, and she did not choose any of this. The people who did choose it are the ones worth writing about: her mother, who spent years asking the Italian state for a classroom and eventually got one; a teacher who took a posting that almost nobody would take; a mayor, an education official and an archbishop who each had to sign something; and a set of rules that said a primary class needs fifteen pupils and then, for once, said otherwise.

The mother is Monica Abbate. She has lived in Ginostra since she was eighteen, which makes her one of the small number of people who stay through the winter rather than one of the summer population, and she serves as the municipality’s delegate for the hamlet, an unpaid local role that mostly involves asking Lipari town hall for things that larger places take for granted. Reporting on the reopening credits her with having fought for it for a very long time, and the figure that keeps appearing is twenty years.

That figure is worth slowing down on, because the honest version is slightly different and slightly more interesting. Twenty years is how long the school was shut. Abbate is in her mid thirties by the accounts of reporters who met her, and she arrived on the island as a teenager, so twenty years of personal campaigning does not quite add up and no source actually claims it in those words. What is documented is that she pushed for public services in a settlement that had almost none, that the school was the one she pushed hardest for, and that the paperwork which finally did it is recent and specific. A formal request went in at the start of this year. The Sicilian regional school office authorised the class eleven days later, inside the annual plan that decides which school sites in the province of Messina open, merge or close. The campaign was long and vague. The decision was fast and dated.

To understand why it took so long, you have to understand what Ginostra is, and it is not a picturesque detail. It sits below the volcano on the side of Stromboli that faces away from the main village, and it is reachable only by sea. There are no roads and no cars. Goods come up from the landing on the backs of fewer than a dozen mules and donkeys, which is not a heritage attraction but the actual logistics system: if you buy a washing machine, a donkey brings it. There is no mains water. It arrives periodically by tanker ship and is stored, supplemented by rainwater. Mains electricity and running water did not exist here at all until 2004, which is to say that people were living without either within living memory of almost every reader of this sentence. Power now comes from photovoltaic panels and generators near the marina. There is no street lighting.

The population numbers do not agree, and it is better to report the disagreement than to split the difference. The French newspaper feature that produced the most detailed account of the reopening puts the winter population at about thirty. Italian agency reporting from the same period puts it at about forty. Older census material also lands near forty. In summer the houses fill with visitors and the figure can reach a few hundred. All of those can be true at once, depending on who counts as resident and which week you ask, and the range itself is the point: this is a community small enough that a single family’s decision changes the arithmetic.

Underneath the charm, there is a hard fact, and it is the reason there was a school to reopen in the first place. Ginostra once had enough children to need a classroom. Then it did not. Depopulation on the smaller Aeolian islands has been running for generations, driven by the ordinary things that empty villages everywhere, work and schools and hospitals, and in Ginostra’s case sharpened by the volcano. At the end of 2002 a flank collapse on Stromboli sent landslides into the sea and generated a tsunami that flooded houses along the shore, twisted metal structures and dragged furniture out of homes onto the rocks. Ash fell across the island. Most residents left on ferries. The civil protection authorities closed Stromboli to visitors while an alarm system was worked out. Nobody was ordered to leave permanently, and plenty came back, but an event like that does not help a place hold on to young families, and the school closed in roughly that era. A reopening is a good news story. A closure is the news story underneath it, and it is the bigger one.

The rule that stood in the way is not unreasonable in itself. Italian regulations set a floor of about fifteen pupils to form a primary class, which exists so that regional authorities cannot quietly run schools with two children and one exhausted teacher as a substitute for proper provision. The floor can be lifted, and a government measure from last year explicitly allows regional education offices to grant waivers for island areas. Getting the waiver required the parents to ask, the municipality of Lipari under mayor Riccardo Gullo to back the request, the head of the local comprehensive institute to forward it, and the provincial and regional school offices, with the Messina superintendent Patrizia Muscolino involved, to approve it. None of that is dramatic. All of it is the thing that actually takes twenty years, which is the unglamorous truth about most campaigns of this kind. You do not win them with a speech. You win them when the right official signs a form in January.

The school belongs to the Istituto Comprensivo Isole Eolie, a single institution that runs seventeen school sites spread across seven islands, from nursery through to lower secondary. It is an administrative arrangement that would look absurd on the mainland and is simply necessary here, because each island has a handful of pupils and none of them can share a bus. Until this autumn, the smallest class in the group, and by most reckonings the smallest in the country, was on Alicudi, an island of around a hundred people where the schoolhouse is reached by climbing something in the order of three hundred and fifty steps up from the shore. It had two pupils. Ginostra has now halved that record.

The classroom itself is a room in the parish of San Vincenzo Ferreri, recently renovated, handed over rent free by the archdiocese of Messina, Lipari and Santa Lucia del Mela under an open ended loan agreement signed off by Archbishop Giovanni Accolla. There is no school building available, so the church gave up a room, which is a reminder that in very small places institutions substitute for one another out of necessity rather than ideology. A school with one pupil does not need a gym or a staff room. It needs a dry room, a table, a door that locks, and a teacher who is physically present.

Finding that teacher was the part that could not be solved by paperwork. When the waiver was granted at the start of the year, two questions were still open in the coverage: where the classroom would go, and who would stand in it. Both have since been answered. The teacher is Laura Mongi, and the accounts of where she came from do not match, so here is both. Italian agency reporting from the first day of term describes her as forty two years old, originally from Gela in southern Sicily and resident in Messina, who came out to the island the day before lessons started. The longer French feature, published a couple of weeks later, describes her as having come from the outskirts of Milan. Those are not easy to reconcile, and there is an obvious possible explanation, that a Sicilian teacher had been posted to the north and transferred back, which is one of the most common career shapes in Italian teaching. But no source says that, so it stays a possibility rather than a fact. What is not in dispute is that she was not already living in Ginostra, because almost nobody is, and that taking the job meant moving to a place with no road out.

Consider what the posting actually involves. One teacher, one pupil, the whole primary curriculum, no colleagues in the building, no supply cover within an hour, and a commute that depends on hydrofoils which in winter simply do not run when the sea says no. Housing has to be arranged in a village where the housing stock is largely holiday lets. Supplies arrive by boat and then by donkey. If a child in an ordinary class has a bad week, the class carries her. Here there is no class to carry anyone, and the relationship between the adult and the child is the entire institution. Teachers who take island posts tend to describe them as either the best or the worst year of their working lives, and on the evidence available this one walked up from the landing, met her pupil at the door, introduced herself by first name and asked whether they should go in.

The reason any of this matters beyond one village is the timetable of the boats, which is the real argument the family made. The alternative to a school in Ginostra was not a slightly longer journey. Hydrofoil schedules do not line up with the start and end of lessons, and for several months of the year the crossing cannot be relied on at all. A six year old attending school on Lipari would have meant one parent renting a second home off the island for the school year, or the family leaving for good. That is the mechanism by which small places die, and it is not sentimental to say so. It is a transport problem wearing the costume of an education problem.

Set against the national picture, the Ginostra classroom is swimming hard upstream. Italy is losing pupils at a rate that would close a city’s worth of schools every few years. The country’s schools had something in the order of one hundred and thirty thousand fewer pupils this year than the year before, and roughly a million fewer than in the 2017 to 2018 academic year. The median age is around forty seven. About a quarter of the population is over sixty five, the highest share in Europe, and only around twelve per cent is under fourteen, among the lowest. In that context, the default direction of travel for any school with a small roll is closure and consolidation, and most of the decisions being made in regional offices this year are about merging sites, not opening them. One room with one child does nothing to change those numbers. What it changes is the precedent, which is why people in other small places were watching.

Some of them were watching with a grievance. On Filicudi, another Aeolian island in the same school district, a ten year old named Tiziana wrote to the Italian prime minister asking to be allowed to finish her schooling at home. She is about to age out of the provision that exists. The waivers that saved Ginostra apply to nursery and primary classes, and not to lower secondary, so families on these islands are told, in effect, that their children may stay until eleven and must then leave. The local course that would have let her continue was not restored, on the grounds that it would require eight teachers for a single pupil. Her own answer, reported in the Italian press, was that the course has historically run with two. A senator has raised the case in parliament, citing the constitutional articles on equality and on the right to education. And on the same morning that Ginostra’s bell rang, Filicudi was reportedly still waiting for a teacher who had not arrived, with the family refusing an offer of remote lessons as a substitute.

That is the honest shape of this story. A classroom opened on an island with no roads because a handful of adults kept asking, and a parallel request a short boat ride away did not. The waiver is granted year by year, which means the campaign is not over, it has merely changed from asking for a school to asking for the same school again next summer. In five years the pupil will reach the age at which the rules currently say she has to go, and unless something changes, her mother will be back in the same office making the same argument about boats.

None of which makes the morning less real. A teacher came a long way to a place that is hard to reach, a priest handed over a room, an official signed a waiver, and a woman who has spent most of her adult life in a village of a few dozen people got back a service that village had lost before her daughter was born. The register has one name on it. The point was never the name. The point was that a family living on the far side of a volcano, where the water comes by ship and the shopping comes by donkey, now has the same ordinary choice everyone else has, which is to stay.

The trolley was the giveaway. Every other woman on that stage had a party piece, a song or a dance or a recitation, and Caoilfhinn Ni Choiligh came out with a wheeled rail of wigs, like a props cart. She went along them. Then she reached up, took off the dark one she had walked on in, and put a blonde one on instead, and explained that this was the point, that she can change her hair whenever she likes and that a wig is an accessory you can have styled before you ever put it on.

Then she took that one off too, and finished the rest of her interview bare headed, in front of a live audience in a sports arena in Kerry and a national television audience watching the biggest broadcast night in the Irish calendar.

The following night, out of thirty two women, the judges picked her. She is the 2026 Rose of Tralee.

What makes this worth more than a clip is what she did next, which was go back to the course she had already enrolled on. Caoilfhinn Ni Choiligh works in retail in Mullingar, in the Irish midlands, and she is training to be a wig maker. Not a wig seller. A maker. Of all the things that could have followed a moment like that, the one she chose was a hand trade.

First, though, the thing that almost every piece of international coverage gets wrong about the event itself, because it changes how you read her twelve minutes on that stage.

The Rose of Tralee is not a beauty pageant. That is not a defensive line from the festival’s own press material, it is how the thing is actually built. There is no swimsuit round. There never has been. Appearance is not scored. The published criteria are personality and suitability to act as an ambassador for the year, and the festival talks about aspirations, ambitions, intellect, social responsibility and Irish heritage. In practice each Rose gets an interview on stage with the host, a few minutes of conversation about who she is and what she cares about, and a party piece if she wants one.

It started in 1959, got up by a handful of local business people in Tralee, in County Kerry, to pull visitors into the town. It was open only to women from Tralee at first, then to the county, and from 1967 to any woman of Irish birth or Irish descent anywhere in the world, which is why the lineup every year includes Roses from Chicago, New York, Sydney, Dubai and London alongside the thirty two counties. There is an upper age limit of twenty nine. Since late 2021 married women and transgender women have been eligible. Unmarried mothers were excluded until 2008, which is the kind of detail that tells you more about the institution’s history than any brochure.

And here is the irony sitting at the centre of it. The festival is named after a nineteenth century ballad about a woman called Mary, and the entire burden of that song is that she was lovely to look at. The event named after it has spent decades insisting, correctly, that it is not judging anyone on their looks. Ireland has never quite stopped arguing about whether that works. The lovely girls jibe has followed it around for thirty years. Every August there are the memes and the eye rolls and somebody writing that it has had its day.

Which is the context that a trolley of wigs was wheeled into.

Caoilfhinn Ni Choiligh is from Mullingar in County Westmeath. She has had alopecia areata since she was fifteen, which she has talked about openly and at length in her own words, and which is the only basis on which it appears here. She has described what the start of it felt like in a way that nobody else writing about her has improved on: that when you lose your hair there is a bit of grief in it, because you are losing a small piece of yourself.

Fifteen is a specific cruelty of an age for that to happen, for reasons that need no elaboration to anyone who was ever fifteen.

She is twenty five in most of the reporting and twenty six in some of it, and both are probably right, because she said in the summer that she had turned twenty five the previous August, which puts her birthday within days of the festival itself. Earlier this year she passed the ten year mark, and she has said that was the thing that moved her. Ten years in, she worked out that she had accumulated practical knowledge that would be useful to somebody else, and that sitting on it was a waste.

So she started putting herself out there, which is her phrase, not an interviewer’s. She co founded a support group called The Hair Loss Haven with her friend Saoirse. It runs meetups and events for people losing their hair, from any cause, and the work it does is the unglamorous specific sort: when do you get your first wig, what do you do about the in between stage, how do you handle the day you tell people. A clinic can tell you what is happening to your scalp. It cannot tell you what to say to your manager. She gets a steady traffic of messages from strangers asking exactly those questions.

She has form on this kind of thing. Before any of it she had worked with Comhairle na nOg, Ireland’s network of local youth councils, and with the Irish Second Level Students’ Union, which are both organisations where the entire job is getting young people’s own views into rooms that would otherwise decide without them.

She was chosen as the Westmeath Rose on a June evening at a hotel in Athlone, out of a field of twenty women. Then came the Rose Tour, which is a genuinely odd piece of Irish tradition in which the whole group travels the country together for a fortnight before the festival, and then Tralee.

The clothes detail is worth a line, because it is the opposite of the image people have of this event. The gown she wore on the night she was crowned was rented, from a shop in her own town called The Dress Collective.

About the stage itself. She has been candid that she thought hard about whether to do the wig segment at all, and that the hesitation was not stage fright. It was the risk of being flattened into one fact about herself, of becoming the alopecia Rose and nothing else for a year. She decided to do it anyway, on the grounds that it genuinely has shaped who she is and that pretending otherwise would be its own kind of lie. She has since said that taking the wig off on the opening night was the highlight of the whole thing, and the part of it she is proudest of.

There is a strong temptation, in a story like this, to park the whole thing on the word brave and go home. It is worth resisting, partly because it is lazy and partly because she herself keeps steering away from it. Her line after she won was not about courage. It was that you can be a Rose whatever your imperfections and whatever your background. Her line to younger girls was that they should never let anybody dull their confidence. And the line she gave afterwards about the crying, hers and the audience’s, was that emotion is powerful and is not something we should be apologising for, which is a more interesting sentence than any of the headlines written around it.

Now the part that nobody expected, and the reason this is a story with an ending rather than a clip with a caption.

Wig making is a real trade and a dying one. A machine made wig is sewn: wefts of hair stitched in rows onto a cap, fast and cheap and recognisably a wig from across a room. A hand made one is knotted. Someone sits with a tiny hook and a base of lace or fine mesh and ties hair into it a few strands at a time, controlling the direction each one lies in, thinning the density at the front so the hairline looks like it grew there, building a parting that reads as scalp. It is close, slow, repetitive work and the difference between a good one and a bad one is almost entirely in the hands of the person who made it. The people who can do it properly are not numerous and they are not young.

That is the thing Caoilfhinn Ni Choiligh is studying for, while working in retail to pay for it. Her route into it was not a careers fair. It was eight or nine years of being a customer, of wearing the things daily, of knowing from the inside which seams itch and which partings fool nobody and what it costs in confidence when a wig is slightly wrong.

The money is the quiet scandal underneath all of this, and it is worth stating plainly because it is the part that shapes everyone else’s experience of hair loss and not just hers. In Ireland there is a state grant towards a hairpiece, wig or hair replacement, introduced in 2022 under the Department of Social Protection’s Treatment Benefit Scheme. It names alopecia areata specifically among the conditions it covers, along with hair loss from cancer treatment, scarring alopecias and hair loss after surgery, trauma or burns. You can claim it once in a calendar year. The ceiling is five hundred euro, which is roughly five hundred and eighty dollars.

That is a real improvement on nothing, and nothing is what existed before 2022. It is also a long way short of what a good hand made human hair wig costs, which is why the second hand market, the online guesswork and the long silent misery of wearing something that does not quite sit right are all still thriving. Somebody has to actually make the things, and make them well, and know what they are for.

So the arc of it is this. A fifteen year old loses her hair. She spends a decade learning, by necessity, everything there is to know about an object most people never think about. At twenty five she decides the knowledge is worth something to other people, starts a support group, and then goes on the most watched television programme in her country, takes the object off in front of about half a million people, and talks about it. Then she wins, which was not the plan, and now she has a year of public engagements and a car and a travel voucher worth around twenty nine thousand dollars, and she is still going to her wig making classes.

The prize list has one accidentally perfect item in it, by the way. Among the travel voucher and the loan of an electric car and the free hotel room in Tralee, the new Rose of Tralee receives a year of hair styling services from the local further education college. Nobody designing that package was thinking about a winner with alopecia. She can presumably put it to use, given that she owns more hair than most people in the arena.

The year ahead is a job, not a tiara. A Rose does school visits and charity work and openings and interviews, somewhere upwards of a hundred engagements, in Ireland and abroad. She has said she does not want the whole twelve months to be about her hair, and she is right to want that, because she is also a person who has worked on youth representation for years and who is halfway through qualifying in a skilled trade.

But she knows exactly what the hair bought her. Her own reckoning of the stage moment was not that she had been inspiring. It was that she had a platform for a few minutes, that she wanted to say her piece about something that matters to her, and that if one person watching who was in the middle of losing their hair saw a woman take a wig off and keep talking, that was the whole point and she had got it done.

The wig she pulled off on that stage is now the thing she is learning to build. Strand by strand, with a hook, badly at first, the way everybody learns a trade. It is not a metaphor. It is a course, with assessments, and she has to pass it.

The mathematics paper came back at 145. The anatomy paper came back at 139. The total was 721 against a stated maximum of 800, and it was good enough for first place nationally in the medical stream. Guo Bin is nineteen. He has been blind since he was six, when he was badly hurt by another person in Shanxi province, and he read every one of those papers with his fingers.

The number that travelled around the Chinese internet was 721. The part almost nobody carried correctly, in Chinese or in English, was which examination it belonged to.

It was not the gaokao. That matters, and not because of pedantry. China runs a second national entrance examination, sat on a different day, on different papers, with its own ranking and its own allocation of university places, and it exists only for candidates with disabilities. Its name in Chinese is dan kao dan zhao, which translates roughly as separate examination, separate admission. Guo Bin sat that one. When the reports say he came first in the country, the country they mean is the field of blind and low vision candidates who sat the medical papers on that route, which is a few hundred people rather than the thirteen million or so who sit the ordinary gaokao.

That sounds, written down, like a deflation. It is the opposite. Once you understand what the second examination is and where it came from, the 721 stops being a feelgood number and starts being a genuinely interesting one.

The route was invented at the exact university Guo Bin has now registered at. In 1987, Changchun University, in Jilin province in China’s northeast, opened a college of special education and became the first institution in the country to admit students with disabilities through a separate examination of its own. Before that, a blind school leaver in China had essentially nowhere to go. The ordinary examination was not available in braille and universities were not obliged to take anyone who could not sit it.

Over the following decade the model spread. Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Technology, Beijing Union University, Liaoning Normal University and others built their own versions. By the late 2010s there were somewhere in the region of twenty three institutions in China running the separate route.

The catch was always the menu. For most of the route’s life, the majors on offer to blind candidates were a short and predictable list: massage, music, and fine art, with business management added for candidates with physical disabilities. The logic was employment, and in practice it meant that if you were blind and academically strong in China, your reward for being academically strong was a place on a massage course.

The second thing worth knowing is that the separate route is no longer the only one. In 2014, for the first time, blind candidates were able to sit the ordinary gaokao on braille papers. Three years later the education ministry set out twelve specific accommodations that candidates with disabilities are entitled to ask for, braille and large print papers and extra time among them. Two roads now exist, and a candidate picks one.

You can see both of them operating inside a single school. At the Wuhan School for the Blind, where Guo Bin spent twelve years, this year’s leaving cohort split. Five pupils sat the ordinary gaokao. Twelve took the separate route. Sixteen of them ended up with university places. That is the real texture of the thing, and it is a long way from the way the story was told in English, where the exam was simply called the gaokao and the distinction evaporated.

Guo Bin took the separate route and he took the medical stream, which is where the choice gets interesting, because he did not take the obvious thing at the end of it.

He is registered at Changchun University on two degrees at once. Traditional Chinese medicine, which sits broadly inside the historic track and is the respectable, well worn path for a blind student with a good head for study. And computer science and technology, which is not on that path at all. One half of his timetable is the oldest answer China has to the question of what a blind graduate does for a living. The other half is a bet that the answer has changed.

That is not nothing for someone who has been reading by hand since he was seven. His mathematics teacher at the Wuhan school, Zheng Xiaokun, described the method plainly enough: where a sighted pupil takes in a diagram at a glance, Guo Bin would touch the braille over and over and reason the problem through again and again until it held. Braille mathematical notation is its own language, linear where print is spatial, and it is slow. Science came through tactile models, recordings, screen readers, and a lot of repeated explanation out loud.

The school he did all that in is older than most of the city around it. It opened in 1919 as a mission school for blind girls and was renamed the Wuhan School for the Blind in 1952. In more than a century it has put thousands of children through, and since 2009 it has sent more than a hundred and twenty of them on to higher education.

What a residential blind school actually teaches is not what people assume. New pupils there start with a compulsory week of orientation and mobility, and the course begins at the school gate, because the first thing you have to own is the route in. Boarding starts from the fourth year. Dormitory doors are fitted with voice alerts so that a corridor can be read by ear. Alongside the academic timetable there is daily life skills training, cooking, laundry, keeping your own things in order, and eighteen arts clubs running under the name Six Dot Angels, after the six dots of a braille cell. There is also a tuina wing with practice rooms, where pupils on the vocational track put in thousands of hours of hands on work.

The school’s own line about its pupils is that they have simply swapped one way of looking at the world for another, which is a better sentence than most of what has been written about Guo Bin.

He did not arrive there by accident. After he was hurt in 2013, his family had offers from schools in Beijing and in Guangzhou as well. According to the reporting by the Hubei Daily group, which broke and has owned this story throughout, they chose Wuhan because of how two members of staff behaved towards them: a vice principal named Zhou Dejun, and a music teacher named Zhang Long. Guo Bin enrolled in the spring of 2014.

Zhang Long is the second person in this story, and not a supporting one. He is now a vice principal of the school himself. He was Guo Bin’s homeroom teacher for nine of the twelve years and his mentor for all of them, and he came at the boy sideways, through music, on the theory that a six year old who had lost his sight needed something to do with his hands before he needed a curriculum.

It worked to a degree that is slightly absurd. Guo Bin plays the ocarina, the bass, the Native American flute and at least two more wind instruments, depending on which account you read. In 2015 he was one of the founders of VMV, described in the Chinese coverage as the first blind electronic band in Hubei province, in which he played bass. For years he was up at half past four in the morning to get an hour of practice in before school. The band built an online following in the tens of thousands.

The city did its share too. The education authorities waived his fees and his books and paid a monthly living allowance. The school employed his father as campus security and his mother as a residential life teacher, which meant the family moved with him instead of handing him over. His sister went to a local primary school. Charitable foundations covered the rest. None of that makes the arithmetic of a 721 any less his, but it is the honest answer to how a child from a village in Shanxi ends up doing braille calculus in Hubei.

And then, at the end of all of it, the part of the story that is actually about leaving.

On the sixth of September, Guo Bin walked into Changchun University as its four thousand eight hundred and eighty third new student of the intake. He came in his school uniform, with his parents, his sister, the school’s principal Zheng Feng, and Zhang Long. He had admitted beforehand that he was nervous about an unfamiliar place. On the day he said he was excited, and that it was his first time in Changchun.

Changchun is about a thousand miles from Wuhan, in the far northeast, where the winters are serious. It is also, because of that college founded in 1987, one of the few campuses in China with nearly four decades of practice at having blind undergraduates on it. Senior students came out to meet him. There were welcome boards at the gate, and Zhang Long walked him along them one by one.

Then they went to the dormitory, and Zhang Long did the thing that the whole twelve years had been for. He took him round the room starting from the door, a piece at a time, until Guo Bin could get from the doorway to his own bed without help. The next task was the route from the dormitory to the canteen, which the two of them walked until it was learned.

That is what a teacher of blind children does on the last day. Not a speech. A floor plan, transferred by hand, and then a walk to where the food is.

They had one more day. On the seventh they went out to the Changchun World Sculpture Park, and when they reached a cast of Rodin’s The Thinker, Zhang Long solved the problem the way the school had taught him to solve every problem. He stood in the pose himself, let Guo Bin feel the shape of it, the angle of the back, the fist against the jaw, the line of the arm on the knee, and then stepped away and let him copy it. Guo Bin got it. Zhang Long, by the account of the Hubei reporters who were there, kept nodding, which was wasted on his pupil and presumably not on anyone else watching. His line was that not being able to see is all right, that looking at the world with your hands and listening to it with your ears and feeling it with your heart is quite enough.

Then he went home to Wuhan, which is the ending, and the reason this is a story rather than a score.

Guo Bin has been explicit about what he wants the two degrees for. His stated wish, repeated in every interview he has given, is to finish at Changchun and go back to the Wuhan School for the Blind as a teacher. He wants the job that Zhang Long has. He has said he wants to use what happened to him and what he has learned to look after other visually impaired children and give them a future, which is a nineteen year old’s way of saying he would like to be the person at the dormitory door next time.

It is worth sitting with the shape of that for a second, because it is unusual. The conventional version of this story ends at the gate, with the score and the admission letter and a line about overcoming. This one ends with the pupil planning to walk back in the other direction, into the building, to do the slow unglamorous work of teaching a seven year old which way the canteen is.

There is one more thing to say honestly, and it concerns the 721 itself. The examination Guo Bin topped is a smaller, separate, parallel system, and reasonable people in China argue about whether it should still exist in its current form. Keeping it means keeping a route that works, with places reserved and papers designed for the candidates who sit them. Keeping it also means keeping a narrower menu and a ranking that is not directly comparable to anyone else’s. The 2014 opening of the ordinary gaokao to braille papers was celebrated precisely because it offered a way out of that enclosure, and the twelve pupils at Guo Bin’s own school who chose the separate route this year, against five who did not, suggest the question is live.

Guo Bin is now inside both arguments at once. He is a product of the separate system, first in it, and he is studying the subject that the separate system was built to channel blind students into, alongside the subject it never offered them. If the computer science half works, he will be an argument for the menu getting longer. If he goes back to Wuhan and teaches, he will be an argument for the school.

Either way, the number on the paper was 721, the maths was 145, and the last thing anyone taught him before he was left to it was the way to the canteen.

On a summer walk two years ago, a ranger called Gary Pickles went up to Sycamore Gap on Hadrian’s Wall to plan a guided walk and found something nobody had promised was coming. Around the raw edge of the stump where one of the most photographed trees in Britain used to stand, there were about a dozen tiny green shoots. Each carried between one and six leaves. The park measured them at two to four centimetres, and the comparison it used was a coin, because that is genuinely the scale we are talking about. You could have covered any one of them with a twenty pence piece.

Three years after the tree was felled in one night, those shoots have become a thick ring of leafy growth standing two to three feet tall all the way around the stump. That is the state of the thing now, reported by the National Trust and attributed to Andrew Poad, its general manager at Hadrian’s Wall, who says the growth is really encouraging and that the protective measures taken at the site are paying off. It is a genuine two year progression, and anyone who saw the coin sized shoots photographed in 2024 and assumes that is still the picture is two years out of date.

And here is the part that has not made the headlines. A thick ring of shoots is not a tree coming back. It is a stump doing something very particular, and what the people responsible for the site do next will decide whether Sycamore Gap ends up with one tree again or something that looks nothing like the thing in all the photographs.

Start with what is actually happening in the wood, because the biology is the best part of this story and it is almost never explained properly.

A felled sycamore is not a dead sycamore. Cutting the trunk off takes away the leaves, which is how a tree feeds itself, but it leaves two things intact: a root system that has spent a century storing sugars, and a layer of dormant buds sitting under the bark around the base. Those buds have been there the whole time, doing nothing, held in check by chemical signals coming down from the canopy above. Remove the canopy and the signals stop. The buds get released all at once, with the full stored energy of a hundred year root system behind them and no leaves left anywhere to compete for it.

The result is not one careful replacement stem. It is a scramble. Dozens of buds break at the same moment and every one of them goes for the light, which is why regrowth from a cut stump comes as a ring rather than a single shoot, and why it is so fast. In the first season after cutting, the energy available per shoot is tiny, which is why 2024 produced coin sized sprouts. Once those first leaves start feeding the system, the growth rate changes completely, and two to three feet in the following couple of seasons is exactly what a healthy sycamore stool does.

Humans have known about this for thousands of years and built an entire woodland economy on it. It is called coppicing. You cut a tree down to the base on a rotation, the stump throws up a crop of straight poles, you come back in a decade or two and cut those, and the stool regrows again, more or less indefinitely. Some coppice stools in British woodlands are far older than any of the single trunked trees around them, precisely because they keep getting cut. Sycamore is one of the species that does it extremely readily.

Which means the thing on Hadrian’s Wall right now is, botanically speaking, a coppice stool. That happened by accident, after a crime, to a tree that nobody ever intended to coppice, and it is the reason the regrowth story is more complicated than good news.

Because a coppice stool left alone becomes a multi stemmed thicket. Not a tree with a trunk and a crown, but a cluster of upright stems fanning out from a wide base, all roughly the same age, all competing. That is a perfectly healthy plant. It is not the silhouette that made Sycamore Gap famous. The tree that stood there was a single trunked sycamore of about fifteen metres, planted as a landscape feature in the late nineteenth century by the Newcastle lawyer John Clayton, who spent decades excavating and preserving stretches of Hadrian’s Wall and put a tree in a dip in the ridge because it would look right there. It did. For well over a century it sat in that gap in a way that photographers could not leave alone.

So the decision ahead is a real one, and it is not a technicality. Leave all the shoots and you get a stool: vigorous, resilient, almost certainly long lived, and shaped like a bush. Reduce the shoots down to one and you are attempting to grow a single trunked tree out of the side of an old stump, trying to recreate the thing in the photographs. That second option has costs. Choosing a leader means cutting away healthy growth and concentrating everything on one stem, which is slower and more fragile. A stem growing from the edge of a stump does not have the structural geometry of a trunk growing from its own roots, and the union where it meets the old wood can be a weak point for decades. The old stump will eventually rot from the middle, which is normal and not fatal, but it does mean a single chosen stem has to establish its own root support as the thing it is standing on decays beneath it.

There is a second reason the fencing matters, and it is older than any heritage site. The shoots coming off a cut stump are soft, green and highly palatable, and they appear at exactly the height a grazing animal browses. Coppice workers have fenced or stacked brush around their stools for centuries for precisely that reason, because a stool that gets browsed hard in its first years can be set back season after season until it gives up. Sycamore Gap sits in open, grazed upland where there is very little else growing tall, and anything tender at knee height is conspicuous. The ring of shoots has got to two or three feet, which is roughly the height at which it stops being a snack and starts being a thicket, and getting it through that window was never guaranteed.

The place itself is part of the difficulty. The gap is a dip in a hard ridge of rock, high, thin soiled and fully exposed to weather coming across open country. That is exactly why the original tree was so striking, because it was the only vertical thing for a long way in either direction, and it is also why growing a replacement there is harder than growing one in a sheltered garden. Wind pulls at young stems and rocks their root plate, and a late frost can take the first flush of leaves off a stool that has just spent stored energy producing them. None of that is fatal to a sycamore, which is a famously tough species and happy in bad ground. It does mean progress at this site is measured in seasons that go well rather than in a straight line.

Nobody has published a decision. The reporting says rangers will manage the growth depending on how it develops, which is the honest answer rather than an evasive one, because at two to three feet you cannot yet tell which stems are going to be strong and which are going to sulk. But the choice is coming, and it is a choice between a healthy plant and a recognisable one.

It is also worth saying clearly what is not known. There is no published arboricultural assessment of this stump’s long term prospects. Vigorous regrowth in year three is a very good sign and it is not a guarantee. Stools can push out a mass of shoots on stored energy and then falter if the root system has been damaged or if the stems get weakened by disease or weather. The two to three feet figure comes from the Trust and the reporting, not from a survey anyone has published. The Times put it about as well as it can be put: it will be many years before the tree regains anything like its old presence. Three years in, what can honestly be said is that the stump is alive, well fed and growing fast.

Which brings up the strangest problem at the site, and the most awkward one to talk about, because the threat is not vandalism. It is affection.

The protective measures Poad named are fencing, reducing soil compaction around the roots and limiting human disturbance. Soil compaction is the one that matters most and the one people least expect. Tree roots do not need soil so much as they need the spaces between it. A root takes in water and oxygen through the pores and gaps in loose ground, and the fine feeding roots near the surface are the ones doing most of that work. When thousands of feet walk over the same few square metres, the soil squeezes shut. The pores close, water runs off instead of soaking in, oxygen cannot get down, and the fine roots in the top layer suffocate. It is slow, invisible and entirely capable of killing a tree that looks fine above ground.

And the people doing it came out of love. In the weeks after the felling, Sycamore Gap turned into a place of pilgrimage. People walked up to stand by the stump, left flowers and notes, and brought children to see it. Some had scattered ashes at that tree, or been proposed to under it, or had it as the backdrop in a photograph on a wall at home. Asking those people to stay off the ground is a genuinely uncomfortable request, which is presumably why the Trust’s language is about fencing and limiting disturbance rather than telling anyone off. The visitors were never the problem. Their footsteps were. Those are different things and the site is managed on that distinction.

Alongside the stump there is a second project running, and it is a quieter kind of success. Seed and material recovered from the tree were taken away and grown on, and from that stock came forty nine saplings, one for each foot of the original tree’s height. They have been distributed across the country to schools, parks, national parks and charities, under the name Trees of Hope. One went to King Charles for Windsor Great Park. A section of the trunk itself was moved off the ridge and later put on display at a visitor centre nearby, where people can stand next to a cut face of hundred year old wood.

There is something clarifying about those saplings. Each one is genetically the same tree, grown from its own seed line, and not one of them is the Sycamore Gap tree. The thing that was lost was never the genetics. It was a particular organism in a particular dip in a ridge beside a Roman wall, in a landscape where almost nothing else grows tall, which is why it photographed the way it did and why it ended up in a film and on bedroom walls and in people’s memories of specific days. You can plant the same sycamore in forty nine places and give forty nine communities something to look after, and you still have not replaced the one in the gap. The only candidate for that is the stump.

The crime itself can be told briefly, which is the right way to tell it. The tree was cut down on a windy night in late September 2023, when storm winds covered the sound of a chainsaw. Two men, Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers, were convicted of criminal damage and jailed for four years and three months, with the damage to the tree assessed at more than six hundred thousand dollars in value and further damage to the ancient wall where the trunk fell across it. No motive that satisfies anybody has ever been established. That is the whole of it, and it is background to this story rather than the subject, because the interesting thing about Sycamore Gap now is not the men who cut it. It is what the stump did afterwards.

What it did was behave exactly as sycamore wood behaves when you cut it, which is to say it refused to accept the premise. The buds under the bark did not know anything had happened except that the canopy was gone. Within a year they had produced a dozen specks of green you could cover with a coin. Within three they had produced a ring of growth up to the height of a child, dense enough that the reporting calls it thick, in a spot that thousands of people walk past.

The decision still to come is the part worth watching. Somewhere in the next few seasons, somebody at the National Trust is going to stand in front of that stump and decide how many stems it keeps. Everything the site becomes for the next hundred years sits in that call: a broad, multi stemmed stool that will outlive everyone involved and look nothing like the photographs, or one chosen stem given everything, aimed at a silhouette in a dip on a ridge that people still drive for hours to see. The tree, for its part, has already done the hard half. It grew back without being asked. The rest is up to us.